Wednesday, April 27, 2011
In this blog, I want to examine the ways in which the colonizer develops a mentality that justifies his actions and grants him imagined legitimacy. For clarification's sake, in speaking of the “colonizer,” I am referring to the nation that takes power and privilege from the colonized people while oppressing and exploiting them, and “legitimacy” refers to the colonizer's responsibility to the colonized people (all-be-it self-imposed) and status as a result of colonized's acceptance of his role (dependency complex), as well as his consequential rights to any privilege granted to him by virtue of his powerful position.
Throughout the semester, I have wondered how any nation could possibly get away with the atrocities of colonialism with the whole world watching. During the Holocaust, for example the Nazi regime efficiently and quietly murdered millions. I recently learned that it took almost 12 years for the news and evidence of the many tragedies of the Holocaust to reach America, due in part to the fact that there was no global media. Still, after hearing about what had gone on, many people could not believe it could have happened, and even more could not (and cannot) understand how such a great number of people – more than the nation of Germany in fact – could have believed so strongly in a social-political agenda as to commit such an unprecedented act of genocide.
Today, in the age of global communication and connectedness. it is not nearly as possible as it once was for a nation to make such a move without the whole world knowing, but sometimes for more complex reasons, these situations don't receive the attention they warrant. Last year I took a survey course in human geography and heard a Tibetan man speak about the issues that had torn his country apart from the roots. His story affected me so much that I wanted to tell all the people around me about the bothersome things I'd found out, to let everyone know that what seems in the past is still going on today for Tibet. Life became busy, and I didn't share the things I'd found out with many people, but now for my sake and yours, I'd like to take a closer look at the cultural and colonial history of what I consider to be one of the most valuable places in the world.
Monday, April 11, 2011
Monday, April 4, 2011
The Tibetan people are said to have been warlike and greedy once upon a time, but have since then embraced the peaceful ways of Buddhism and beaten their swords into plowshares. An unfortunate result of this – probably the only one – is the lack of an army that could have opposed Chinese invasion. This is not to say there is no opposition within Tibet, in fact there have been recent uprisings and many public protests in the half-century since China's invasion, but the nation is currently under the administration of the government of the Tibet Autonomous Region, which is based in the Republic of China and oftentimes violent. Many Tibetans have fled their homeland and gone into exile in other nations; from those places they have been able to give the world a firsthand account of the brutal history of Chinese colonization.
Of the fifteen publications on Tibet that I was able to find on the shelves in our school library, twelve were published in the States, two in the UK, and one in Hong Kong. Maybe there aren't many printing presses in Tibet, still I wanted to take notice of where the written history that I am getting my information from originated. Since it does not apply to the specific situation I am analyzing, I have excluded the little bit of information I've gathered about Tibet's early history (including the first kingdoms, annexations, territorial unities and so on). It is, however, worth mentioning that there have been a million "usurpers" in the history of Tibet, even before it became a nation. First, there were small scale usurpations, then a push-and-pull of power between the ancestors of Tibet and the Mongol people, then the same with India, and a dozen other conflicts and micro-colonizers. This fact has challenged my assumptions about colonialism. Ive had to stop and ask myself, "Is the process of colonization merely something that's inevitable, collecting like dryer lint or a snowball rolling downhill?" After all, if there were no collective actions made by humans (such as the formation of a state), we wouldn't have established religion, or neighborhoods, or marriage and family, or systems of trade. Furthermore, even in a relationship between two people, there is often a more powerful personality, and a more submissive one. So, isn't some form of domination simply what happens when one person's life collides with another? Everything must have an impact.